A Qualitative Evaluation of COVID-19 Preventative Response Activities in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

OBJECTIVE: In this evaluation of COVID-19 preventative response programs in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), we aimed to explore community understandings of COVID-19, assess operational successes and challenges of COVID response activities, and identify barriers to practicing COVID-19 preventative behaviors. METHODS: Thirty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted from April to September 2021 in South Kivu, DRC, with community members (n = 16) and programmatic stakeholders (n = 15) (healthcare providers, government officials, and developmental and NGO staff engaged in COVID-19 response). FINDINGS: Most community members were aware of COVID-19 and its global burden, but few were aware of local transmission in their area. Some community members attributed COVID-19 to actions of malevolent neighbors, miasma ("bad air"), or spirits. Awareness of COVID-19 preventative measures was widespread, largely because of radio and TV health promotion programs. Community members and programmatic stakeholders both said community-level non-compliance to COVID-19 preventative measures was high despite high awareness of preventative methods. Community members expressed concern that face masks distributed as part of preventative programs contained the COVID-19 virus. Programmatic stakeholders emphasized the need for broader health system strengthening with improved coordination, provision of resources to health facilities at the provincial level, and prioritization of research. Lessons learned from addressing Ebola were leveraged for COVID-19 health promotion, rapid training of healthcare personnel, and surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Community-informed approaches are needed for effective COVID-19 preventative response programs in South Kivu, DRC. Our study identified successes and challenges in COVID-19 response activities. Future research should assess the effectiveness of integrating preventive programs with COVID-19 vaccination efforts.

Methods to Evaluate COVID-19 Preventive Hygiene Programs: Observed Mask Wearing, Handwashing, and Physical Distancing Behaviors in Public Indoor Spaces in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The objective of our study was to develop and test observational methods to evaluate COVID-19 preventive hygiene behaviors and physical distancing, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a government mandate on indoor fully covered mask wearing. An observational study was conducted of 4,736 individuals from April to October 2021 using 5-hour and rapid (10-minute) structured observations and spot checks to evaluate mask-wearing, handwashing, and physical-distancing behaviors, and the functionality of handwashing stations in 161 indoor public spaces across Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Sixteen percent of individuals entering indoor public spaces were wearing a mask that fully covered their nose and mouth (fully covered mask wearing). Fully covered mask wearing was lowest inside schools (1%), universities (2%), religious establishments (22%), and health facility wards (28%). Overall physical distancing of more than 1-m inside indoor public spaces was 22%, and was lowest inside schools and religious establishments (7%). Thirty-nine percent of handwashing stations had water and a cleansing agent present. Ten percent of individuals washed their hands with a cleansing agent before entering an indoor space. Overall, fully covered mask wearing was similar for 5-hour and rapid structured observations (16% versus 15%). The odds of fully covered mask wearing was significantly greater with increased government enforcement of mask wearing in public spaces through fines (odds ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.02-7.30). This study presents rigorous methods using structured observations to assess government mandates and programs on COVID-19 preventive hygiene behaviors in indoor public spaces in settings globally.

Psychopathological states among Congolese health workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic: links with emotion regulation and social support Estados psicopatológicos entre los trabajadores de la salud congoleños durante la primera ola de la pandemia de COVID-19: vínculos con la regulación emocional y el apoyo social 在第一波 COVID-19 疫情期间刚果健康工作者的精神病状态：与情绪调节和社会支持的联系

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented stressor for frontline healthcare workers, notably increasing acute stress disorder and depression rates. Emotion regulation and social support could be major protective factors against such psychopathological states, but their role has not been explored outside Western contexts. Objective: To assess the association between emotion regulation, social support, acute stress disorder, and depression among healthcare workers directly confronted with the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Method: A cross-sectional study assessed acute stress disorder, depression, adaptive (i.e. acceptance, positive refocusing, …) and maladaptive (i.e. self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, …) emotion regulation strategies, social support (instrumental, emotional, and informational levels), as well as self-reported situations and feelings related to COVID-19, in a population of 252 frontline healthcare workers (121 women;131 men;mean age: 39 ± 11 years old) at the Referral General Hospital of Bukavu. We also explored the relations between these variables through bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Forty percent of participants presented symptoms of depression, and 16% presented acute stress disorder. In bivariate logistic regression, these psychiatric outcomes were associated with the availability of a COVID-19 protection kit [OR = 0.24 (0.12–0.98)], hostility toward health workers [OR = 3.21 (1.23–4.21)], putting into perspective [OR = 0.91 (0.43–0.98)], self-blame [OR = 1.44 (1.11–2.39)], catastrophizing [OR = 1.85 (1.01–4.28)], blaming others [OR = 1.77 (1.04–3.32)], emotional support [OR = 0.83 (0.49–0.98)], instrumental support [OR = 0.74 (0.28–0.94)], and informational support [OR = 0.73 (0.43–0.98)]. In multivariate logistic regression, hostility [OR = 2.21 (1.54–3.78)], self-blame [OR = 1.57 (1.02-2.11)], rumination [OR = 1.49 (1.11-3.13)] and emotional support [OR = 0.94 (0.65-0.98)] remained significantly associated with psychiatric outcomes. Conclusion: Depression and acute stress disorder were highly prevalent among Congolese healthcare workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 health pandemic. Hostility, self-blame, rumination, and social support were associated with depression and/or acute stress disorder and should be targeted by interventions aiming to support health workers’ wellbeing. HIGHLIGHTS Frontline health workers presented high prevalence of acute stress disorder (16%) and depression (40%) during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, as they were working in hostile environment without enough protection kits. Acute stress disorder and depression were negatively associated with adaptive emotion regulation and social support;and positively with maladaptive emotion regulation. Intervention aiming to support health workers in pandemics should target emotion regulation and social support.

Psychopathological states among Congolese health workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic: links with emotion regulation and social support.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented stressor for frontline healthcare workers, notably increasing acute stress disorder and depression rates. Emotion regulation and social support could be major protective factors against such psychopathological states, but their role has not been explored outside Western contexts. Objective: To assess the association between emotion regulation, social support, acute stress disorder, and depression among healthcare workers directly confronted with the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Method: A cross-sectional study assessed acute stress disorder, depression, adaptive (i.e. acceptance, positive refocusing, …) and maladaptive (i.e. self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, …) emotion regulation strategies, social support (instrumental, emotional, and informational levels), as well as self-reported situations and feelings related to COVID-19, in a population of 252 frontline healthcare workers (121 women; 131 men; mean age: 39 ± 11 years old) at the Referral General Hospital of Bukavu. We also explored the relations between these variables through bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Forty percent of participants presented symptoms of depression, and 16% presented acute stress disorder. In bivariate logistic regression, these psychiatric outcomes were associated with the availability of a COVID-19 protection kit [OR = 0.24 (0.12-0.98)], hostility toward health workers [OR = 3.21 (1.23-4.21)], putting into perspective [OR = 0.91 (0.43-0.98)], self-blame [OR = 1.44 (1.11-2.39)], catastrophizing [OR = 1.85 (1.01-4.28)], blaming others [OR = 1.77 (1.04-3.32)], emotional support [OR = 0.83 (0.49-0.98)], instrumental support [OR = 0.74 (0.28-0.94)], and informational support [OR = 0.73 (0.43-0.98)]. In multivariate logistic regression, hostility [OR = 2.21 (1.54-3.78)], self-blame [OR = 1.57 (1.02-2.11)], rumination [OR = 1.49 (1.11-3.13)] and emotional support [OR = 0.94 (0.65-0.98)] remained significantly associated with psychiatric outcomes. Conclusion: Depression and acute stress disorder were highly prevalent among Congolese healthcare workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 health pandemic. Hostility, self-blame, rumination, and social support were associated with depression and/or acute stress disorder and should be targeted by interventions aiming to support health workers' wellbeing. HIGHLIGHTS: Frontline health workers presented high prevalence of acute stress disorder (16%) and depression (40%) during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, as they were working in hostile environment without enough protection kits.Acute stress disorder and depression were negatively associated with adaptive emotion regulation and social support; and positively with maladaptive emotion regulation.Intervention aiming to support health workers in pandemics should target emotion regulation and social support.

Antecedentes: La pandemia de COVID-19 es un factor estresante sin precedentes para los trabajadores de atención médica de primera línea, que aumenta notablemente las tasas de trastorno por estrés agudo y depresión. La regulación de las emociones y el apoyo social podrían ser factores protectores importantes contra tales estados psicopatológicos, pero su papel no ha sido explorado fuera de los contextos occidentales.Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación entre la regulación de las emociones, el apoyo social, el trastorno de estrés agudo y la depresión entre los trabajadores de la salud que confrontaron directamente la primera ola de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el este de la República Democrática del Congo.Método: Un estudio transversal evaluó el trastorno de estrés agudo, la depresión, estrategias de regulación emocional adaptativas (es decir, aceptación, refocalización positiva, …) y desadaptativas (es decir, autoculpabilización, rumiación, catastrofización, …), apoyo social (niveles instrumental, emocional, e informacional), así como situaciones y sentimientos autoinformados relacionados con el COVID-19, en una población de 252 trabajadores de salud de primera línea (121 mujeres; 131 hombres; edad media: 39 ± 11 años) en el Hospital General de Referencia de Bukavu. También exploramos las relaciones entre estas variables mediante regresión logística bivariada y multivariada.Resultados: Cuarenta por ciento de los participantes presentó síntomas de depresión y el dieciséis por ciento presentó trastorno de estrés agudo. En regresión logística bivariada, estos resultados psiquiátricos se asociaron con la disponibilidad de un kit de protección COVID-19 [OR = 0.24 (0.12­0.98)], hostilidad hacia los trabajadores de la salud [OR = 3.21 (1.23­4.21)], postura en perspectiva [ OR = 0.91 (0.43­0.98)], autoculpabilización [OR = 1.44 (1.11­2.39)], catastrofización [OR = 1.85 (1.01­4.28)], heteroculpabilización [OR = 1.77 (1.04­3.32)], apoyo emocional [OR = 0.83 (0.49­0.98)], apoyo instrumental [OR = 0.74 (0.28­0.94)] y apoyo informativo [OR = 0.73 (0.43­0.98)]. En la regresión logística multivariada, hostilidad [OR = 2.21 (1.54­3.78)], autoculpabilización [OR = 1.57 (1.02­2.11)], rumiación [OR = 1.49 (1.11­3.13)] y apoyo emocional [OR = 0.94 (0.65­0.98)] permanecieron significativamente asociados con los resultados psiquiátricos.Conclusión: La depresión y el trastorno de estrés agudo fueron muy frecuentes entre los trabajadores de la salud congoleños durante la primera ola de la pandemia sanitaria de COVID-19. La hostilidad, la autoculpabilización, la rumiación y el apoyo social se asociaron con depresión y/o trastorno de estrés agudo y deberían ser el objetivo de las intervenciones destinadas a apoyar el bienestar de los trabajadores de la salud.